muji: (Default)
Steph Mu Ji ([personal profile] muji) wrote in [community profile] ways_back_room2008-07-31 07:50 am
Entry tags:

Daily Entertainment.

Guess who made it to work without their car protesting! \o/! Me, bitches, that's who.

Anywho! Onto the topic: Every fandom has certain litmus tests to see what level of way-too-involved you are. In my experience, a lot of the time, my way-too-involved starts to show when I explain very minute details of a scene/prop/whatever in a way that the average enthusiast might not know about.

Example? Where the hell is Wash's steering wheel?

Anyone else have experience with this?

And oshitz, Debi, I lose -- I ended up crapping out at light eight pm yesterday, so lemme go do your thing now.

ETA: Or someone else already took care of it. >_>;
sdelmonte: (Default)

[personal profile] sdelmonte 2008-07-31 01:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Yup.. And the person who wrote this liked it, so I have to recant the "universally derided."
sdelmonte: (Default)

[personal profile] sdelmonte 2008-07-31 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)
The McCoy pun is the one thing it's fondly remembered for.
genarti: Knees-down view of woman on tiptoe next to bookshelves (strike a pose)

[personal profile] genarti 2008-07-31 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
And yet I'm pretty sure Star Trek is also fictional in the Marvel universe. Without any contradiction being addressed.

Oh, Marvel. Continuity is not always your strong point.

(There's also at least one ST:TNG/X-Men crossover novelization that I've seen. It's pretty awful. But tie-in novels are not exactly canonical, so it doesn't really count.)
wanderlustlover: (Confessions - crystalkirk)

[personal profile] wanderlustlover 2008-07-31 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
(And two different X-men crossover comics! One with TOS and on with TNG!)