Yamato Ishida (
angry_friendship_wolf) wrote in
ways_back_room2020-06-10 09:20 am
Entry tags:
Wednesday DE: Something something Shakespeare psychology corporate
So, last week, another mun introduced me to this amazingly weird corporate assessment that helps you learn your 'actor archetype', which starts off a little strange but okay and then slowly descends into corporate buzzword hell.
So let's fill it out for our characters!
Bonus question: How far would your character get through it before laughing out loud.
So let's fill it out for our characters!
Bonus question: How far would your character get through it before laughing out loud.

no subject
no subject
Fairy Fixit is used to corporate goobledegook, but answered every question earnestly with "somewhat like me", making her most like a storyteller who thinks too fast for most people to follow but least like an explorer, which makes her narrow-minded? Which... ok, she gets visits from adventurer types often enough to accept that it's not the life for her.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
She didn’t laugh at all, but there were several eye rolls. Her leading Actor is the Warrior and her least actor is Nurturer.
Sounds about right.
no subject
Most used: Warrior
Least used: Lover
Sadly, he would have taken this with utmost seriousness, though he would have made a face when "Radiance" came up in the buzzwords.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Cecil: A) does not appreciate the corporate-ness of this, not at all, what the hell actually is this, take it away. B) Is a storyteller, is ANYONE surprised, and his 'most off-stage actor' is 'strategist', which... yep. Cecil, I love you, but holy crap you were left out of the planning for multiple rebellions for a reason, my dear. You work best as bait.
Jon: A) Also does not appreciate the corporate-ness of this, but more because did you see the employee handbook he had to read? Ugh. B) Jon is a Strategist, which... yep, that tracks, this thing is kinda eerie, and his 'most off-stage actor' is.... 'lover'. Which. On one hand... my dudes, he's Ace, so... on the other, he's biromantic and his love story is one of the central themes of the whole dang thing soooooooooooooooooooooooo... hmm. So I mean, if 'lover' is defined as 'Casanova' then yeah, that's... that's not what's going to happen here, not any time soon, Tim get your brain out of the gutter, but if 'lover' can be defined as 'romantic partner', then BAD sorter, no cookie for you. Or maybe it's going off of me answering as season 1 Jon and not season 5 Jon because there has been character growth aplenty so... idk. Conditional cookies, I guess.
Klaus: A) Finds this whole corporate thing hilarious. B) Klaus is... you'll never guess... a Lover! Shock! and he's definitely not a Strategist. This one I can get behind entirely. Also just realized that they define these terms on a 'next page' that I neglected up until now. Whoopsie-doodle.
no subject
no subject
Molly... fully cracked up. LITERALLY TRUE!