Ratonhnhaké:ton/Connor Kenway (
lifethatisscratched) wrote in
ways_back_room2013-08-30 01:00 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Daily Entertainment
Blame
swankyfunk for my recycling this.
→ Comment with your pup(s) -- current and not-so-current/choose your own adventure!
→ Others will respond to your thread stating whom they ship your characters with, romantically or platonicallyor bromantically. (Feel free to suggest interactions as well, like "[This character] should chat with [this character]!")
→ This doesn't, by any means, have to be serious, y'all. Crack pairings are eighteen kinds of welcome.
→ ENJOY YOURSELVES.
(Why did I bust out the stalking icon for Connor? Because he knows your OT3.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
→ Comment with your pup(s) -- current and not-so-current/choose your own adventure!
→ Others will respond to your thread stating whom they ship your characters with, romantically or platonically
→ This doesn't, by any means, have to be serious, y'all. Crack pairings are eighteen kinds of welcome.
→ ENJOY YOURSELVES.
(Why did I bust out the stalking icon for Connor? Because he knows your OT3.)
did someone say troll romance?
<3< is a 2-person romance based on rivalry and frustration. It too is sexual/involves sexual attraction.
<> is a 2-person romance based on mutual support and co-dependence. Two dangerous people who keep each other safe, in either or both senses of the word. Not sexual.
o3< is a 3-person romance based on peacemaking and restrained anger (and possibly sexual tension). It is prevents two people who would be too dangerous as enemies from getting out of hand. Not SUPPOSED to be sexual, in any case.
Re: did someone say troll romance?
Re: did someone say troll romance?