bjornwilde (
bjornwilde) wrote in
ways_back_room2016-07-01 06:04 am
Entry tags:
Friday DE
Yesterday I got to read a preview chapter to one of my canons and got an answer to something that's been bothering me. With this in mind, what are some details you really want from your canons? Are you okay with the vaguest of hand waved details? Do you find it's different for each pup?
Feel free to expand with any questions I haven't thought of.
Also, be sure to take a gander at the long weekend test drive post and maybe take a pup for a spin.
Feel free to expand with any questions I haven't thought of.
Also, be sure to take a gander at the long weekend test drive post and maybe take a pup for a spin.

no subject
However, there is one question I would desperately love to have answered:
How did Marius, dreamy goober who thought that 1830 went pretty well, end up as a person who Enjolras somehow thought might a) show up to a meeting and b) be a person he could trust sending to go gauge the sentiments of other radical republican groups.
no subject
no subject
no subject
it was so hopeful that enjolras remembered to ask about marius again a month later--how's that friend of yours, the one who's been getting so interested in politics. so, you know, another hopeful report was invented.
enjolras starts asking, you know, why can't marius come to meetings, and courfeyrac explains about marius's numerous other political engagements
no subject
Maybe that dude was like some major radical or something.
no subject
The funnier answer involves hijinks, like Marius hiding behind a bush because he's scared of pretty girls laughing at him, and Enjolras happening upon him and thinking he's hiding from the police or something.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Timelines, at the very least clear ones within the story, are things I love; especially if it is a canon that is near our present time. For examples, the canon I mentioned in the post was for Amelia. She leaves canon some 100 or 150 years before the books start. The books are set in the near future, or so I had thought, so did that mean she'd have left the prime material plane around 1900 or 1950? Now I know present time in the books is 2096, so I have a better idea of what tech she'd have know and what humans would've been like when she left.
I still would like to know if Selina's mother is alive or not, but that detail seems to have been left behind. I'd also like to know what life was like for Selina before she ended up on the streets.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Regarding Elrond I would have liked to known more about his relationship with his brother.
no subject
no subject
Lois: It's Smallville--to some degree DC any-form-of-media altogether. I've given up.
Evelyn: oh my god so many BUT at least Dragon Age is reasonably good at filling in holes--just with later canon and usually going BY THE WAY EVERYTHING YOU THOUGHT WAS WRONG IN SOME FASHION.
Anakin and R2: Star Wars is another canon that either it answers questions now that someone other than Lucas is writing it or else is inconsistent enough that I have just given up.
Tavi: . . . . . . . . .
Whose journal I am logged into because, quite frankly, I could fill a notebook at least with questions, theories, logical extrapolations, wanting to know things about history to positively Tolkien-ian levels of detail, and frankly knowing I can't actually ask Butcher any of it because I do not want to be a creepy fangirl, even though it is just that I adore the world but the holes are so large I could crawl through some of them (admittedly, that's not saying much; I am pretty tiny). It has resulted in plans for fics, OOMs, at least one AU, and overthinking details far more than I should because I apparently cannot deal with hand-waving them. So on the one hand, I've given up getting Word of God answers on most of them (but only most! I totally got a couple at last D*C including muahahahahaha yesssss one literally no one but me cares about). On the other: vagueness of detail is reserved for things I don't want to bother with. If I do, I will hack at them until they make at least a facsimile of sense.
no subject
At the moment, the only detail I really want is 'what do the 01 kids think happen to the 02 kids?' For context, 02 has a mostly separate team ('mostly' because Yamato's brother and Taichi's sister are on both teams, and because the 01 kids take a vaguely mentor-ish role), and the opening five minutes of Tri's first episode shows them being violently defeated.
They are then not mentioned again until episode eight - for episodes one to four, this didn't seem too weird, because they take place over a few days, but five to eight take place weeks or months afterwards. Nobody (with the exception of one computer screen) references the fact that four members of the team are missing - not in their strategy meetings, not in casual conversation, not at all - or even acknowledges that these characters exist until one of them (or seemingly one of them, presiding fan theory is that it's some kind of copy) shows up, and then their only reactions are "Ichijouji? How can he be here? How is that possible?"
At the moment, fan theories are running the gamut from 'the 02 kids have been missing since the gates shut, and the 01 kids know that but not what happened to them' to 'everyone is suffering from amnesia and they literally only remembered who any of these people are in episode eight.'
So yeah, I'd moderately like to know that particular detail, because at the moment I'm having to have Yamato kind of skirt around talking about them or anything that happened in 02, but in a way that doesn't make it seem like he's doing it deliberately. This becomes deeply awkward any time Omegamon's fusion breaking down comes up (and it often does, because that's one of Yamato's major sources of strife and conflict in Tri, and also just because it gives me a chance to make him awkward and surly and self-hating, and I love doing that), because it's super-difficult to have him talk about that without mentioning Imperialdramon, Shakkoumon, or Silphymon.
no subject
Templars need to take lyrium to activate all their magic-dispelling skills, right? We have seen that you can't just go "lol, no more of that," quit cold-turkey, and be fine. You also supposedly don't even take your first dose of lyrium until you take your Official Templar Vows.
Alistair left the Order before taking his vows. He also says he was never addicted to lyrium.
SO HOW THE HELL CAN HE USE TEMPLAR-SPECIFIC ABILITIES IN ORIGINS, FFS.
I've seen fan theories that say, "well, he said he wasn't addicted, not that he never took it," and apparently an interview with one of the creators said he did take lyrium -- in which case, the question changes to HOW ARE YOU NOT IN THE SAME SEARING AGONY CULLEN'S CURRENTLY EXPERIENCING. To save my sanity, I've established he never took it and mentally handwaved that some templar abilities don't truly require lyrium (which also explains why Alistair can teach the templar specialization to the Origins player-character: it's like Templar Lite), and the lyrium sort of...activates a second tier of abilities plus acts as a strengthening agent on the don't-really-need-it abilities? I don't know. The contradiction drives me crazy, and if Bioware would just offer some gd clarification on the matter, that would be awesome. Ugh.
(Meanwhile, elsecanon, the worldbuilding in Snowpiercer -- being more allegory than anything -- falls into a shambles if you poke at it too long, but I actually have a lot of fun spackling over the gaps to make it work. The questions it presents make me go "ooh! HM. Let's figure that out!" instead of making me want to rip my hair out like the lyrium question.)
no subject
I have kind of filled in the details on that subject myself, which is mostly okay, but I find myself wondering sometimes.